Daily News

View All News

Massachusetts staffing firm operators indicted for conspiracy, employment tax fraud, obstructing IRS

March 24, 2017

Two owners of a Massachusetts temporary employment agency were indicted for conspiring to defraud the government, failing to pay over employment taxes and obstructing internal revenue laws, the US Department of Justice announced.

Huong Le and Tien Chau allegedly cashed more than $11 million in client checks at a check cashing facility in Worcester, Mass., and used their staffing agency’s site supervisors, office manager and drivers to pay their employees in cash, according to the Department of Justice.

The indictment said Le and Chau ran an employment agency that provided temporary labor to businesses in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. The agency operated under at least four different names: Central Boston Staffing Services, Metro Boston Staffing Services, General Staffing Inc. and Kim’s Staffing Inc. Le and Chau allegedly used family members and other individuals as nominees to conceal their ownership of the business.

The indictment alleges that from 2006 through 2011, Le and Chau allegedly attempted to hide the size of their workforce from the IRS by paying most of their employees cash under the table and causing the filing of false employment tax returns that both underreported the number of their employees and did not report wages paid in cash. 

The indictment also charges that Le and Chau sought to obstruct an investigation by, among other things, directing an employee, after learning of her interview with special agents, to assist them with shredding the agency’s records. Le and Chau also allegedly destroyed and removed computer disks and computers from the business’s office.

An indictment is not a finding of guilt. Individuals charged in indictments are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

If convicted, Le and Chau face a statutory maximum sentence of five years in prison for the conspiracy and employment tax counts and three years in prison for obstructing the internal revenue laws. They also face a term of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.