Daily News

View All News

US – Staffing Firm to Pay $148,000 in Pregnancy Suit

05 March 2012

A federal judge ordered HCS Medical Staffing, a Milwaukee healthcare staffing firm, to pay $148,000 to settle a pregnancy discrimination case, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported Friday.

The lawsuit alleged HCS owner Charles Sisson discriminated against Roxy Leger, the company’s bookkeeper, when he made offensive comments about her pregnancy and fired her because she needed to take maternity leave following the birth of her son, according to the EEOC.

The court entered a default judgment against HCS on Feb. 17 after the company failed to respond to a court order to retain an attorney, according to the EEOC. The court ordered HCS to pay Roxy Leger back pay plus pre-judgment interest in the sum of $48,340, compensatory damages in the sum of $50,000 and punitive damages amounting to $50,000 for a total of $148,340.

Judge J.P. Stadtmueller found that HCS’ owner referred to Leger’s pregnancy as a joke; insisted that maternity leave should last no more than a couple of days; suggested that Leger’s pre-natal appointments were a ruse for additional time off or for money; and gave Leger an offensive diagram of a machine which would allow Leger to return from her maternity leave sooner, according to the EEOC. HCS terminated Leger’s employment and health insurance while she was still in the hospital recovering from a Caesarean section, the EEOC reported. Leger learned of her termination days later by certified mail.

“The conduct at issue in this case was deplorable,” said EEOC Regional Attorney John Hendrickson. “Pregnancy discrimination is sex discrimination. It is flatly prohibited by law. Working to stop it remains a high priority for the EEOC.”

Comments

Add New Comment

Post comment

NOTE: Links will not be clickable.
Security text:*

General Manager

Cheryl Youngs 03/07/2012 11:22 am

Unbelieveable and very disappointiung that anyone is so archaic in their thinking and then to have it actually put it into words and actions is embarrassing to anyone in the employment field.


Operations Manager

Yvonne 03/05/2012 04:36 pm

Mr. Sisson is obviously a very small time operator with no knowledge or regard for the law. Also, the comment by Steve is totally irrelevant and unnecessary. It seems he is just as biggoted as Mr. Sisson is - just to a different category of people.


Steve 03/05/2012 03:16 pm

i bet mr sisson is a tea partier!


Total 3 comments