Daily News

View All News

Qatar – World Cup workers treated like modern-day slaves

23 August 2013

The international community has been called upon by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation) to shun the 2022 World Cup in Qatar unless it reforms its indentured labour practices on its International Day for Remembrance of the Slave Trade.

Almost 21 million people around the world are victims of forced labour according to the International Labour Organisation, but Emir al-Thani’s Gulf Emirate has a particularly poor record. Evidence is increasing of forced labour in the Qatari construction industry responsible for building the World Cup infrastructure for 2022.

Aidan McQuade, the director of Anti-Slavery International told EurActiv. “If that is borne out I think it would be an extremely sad state of affairs. It would be a dreadful pity and an enormous shame on all of us if we are prepared to participate in a world cup that has been brought to us by slavery.”

In April, the Qatar 2022 Supreme Committee announced that it had devised a ‘workers charter’ to protect labour rights. But its details were not shared with the public or trades unions, leading the International Trades Union Confederation (ITUC) to profess itself “very disappointed”.

Qatari government statistics indicate that some 1.2 million migrant workers make up 94% of the workforce. A million new foreign workers are expected to arrive in Qatar over the next decade to help build nine new stadiums and the €15 billion of roads needed by 2022.

Native Qataris only make up 12% of the country’s population, which last year grew 5% because of an influx of foreign workers in the booming construction sector, Human Rights Watch says.

Polls from Qatar University suggest that only half of the country’s migrant blue-collar workers sign contracts before coming to Qatar. A quarter of those who have signed contracts said that they had not been honoured.

Employers must assume legal responsibility for providing their workers with jobs, work visas, housing and often food in the Gulf state. Workers cannot change jobs, leave the country, rent a home, or open a bank account without their employer’s permission.

Such conditions dovetail with UNESCO’s definition of ‘modern forms of slavery,’ particularly where domestic workers are concerned, many of whom have been deceived by traffickers in Asian countries such as India, Bangladesh, and Nepal.

Mr McQuade added: “Two hundred years ago, people used the whip to keep slaves in their place, today they use the confiscation of identity documents.”

Anti-Slavery International proposes a multi-track approach to dealing with the problem, involving:

  • A new UN system for identifying and measuring the number of forced labourers in various countries
  • The naming and shaming of the worst offenders
  • Targeted education aimed at those most vulnerable to traffickers, particularly women in Asia and children in Africa
  • Advancement of the rule of law in Southeast Asia
  • The mainstreaming of the issue into EU practice

Mr McQuade said: “Slavery has remained a marginal issue in aid, trade and diplomatic policy for hundreds of years now and has consequently been able to thrive in many parts of the world, the richest as well as the poorest.”

“We haven’t even seen slavery addressed as a post 2015 Millennium Development Goal, that’s how far off the radar it is in terms of the most influential policy-makers,” he added.

Human rights defenders say they are concerned that the EU still grants Uzbekistan preferential trade privileges despite calls for a cotton boycott of the central Asian state, because of its estimated one million forced labourers. 

But European apathy about forced labour in the Middle East – compared to its engagement with the Arab Spring – could also have another cause, according to James Lynch a spokesman for Amnesty International.

“It is awkward for Western countries who are promoting their businesses in the Gulf to talk about the rights of migrant workers who may be employed by westerners,” he told EurActiv. “There has to be a discussion about this.”

Comments

Add New Comment

Post comment

NOTE: Links will not be clickable.
Security text:*